Guide for network engineers

Method of procedure (MOP) template for network changes

A good MOP lets a qualified engineer who did not write it carry out the change at 2 a.m., know at every step whether it worked, and know exactly when and how to back out.

8-minute read · Free Word template

What a MOP is for

The change record authorizes the work; the MOP is how the work is done. It is written before the change advisory board sees the change, reviewed by a peer who could run it, and followed during the window. Every step has an expected result, and the rollback is written, with its trigger, before anything is touched.

A MOP is specific to one change; a runbook covers a recurring operation. If you make the same change often, turn its MOP into a tested template for a standard change, and keep the pre-check and verification sections for every run.

Scope

  • Intent in one sentence, and the invariants: what must not change.
  • Devices in scope: hostname, role, site, platform, software release, and console or out-of-band access for each.
  • Out of scope: what this change will not touch, stated so nobody widens it during the window.
  • Dependencies: other teams, carriers, vendors and other changes in the same window.
  • The window: start and end with the time zone, the latest time rollback can start and still finish inside the window, and any point of no return.

Risk and impact analysis

  • Blast radius: the devices, paths, services and users affected if the change goes wrong, not only if it goes right.
  • Redundancy during the change: will any service run on a single path, member or unit, and for how long?
  • Expected impact, stated precisely: “one HSRP role change per core, each under 5 seconds of loss”, “the BGP session to ISP-A resets once”.
  • What could go wrong: the realistic failure modes, each with likelihood, impact and mitigation.
  • Testing: lab results, earlier runs of similar changes, and the release notes and known issues for any new software.
  • Conflicts: change freezes, business events and other changes that touch the same devices or paths.

Pre-checks and the go/no-go decision

List each pre-check with its command and its pass condition, and keep the outputs: they are the baseline for verification. Typical pre-checks:

  • Configuration saved, with no unsaved or uncommitted changes, and a copy stored off the device.
  • Console or out-of-band access tested on every device in scope.
  • Both members of every redundant pair healthy and in sync.
  • No open incident on the affected services.
  • Baseline outputs captured for every verification step (see how to verify a network change).
  • Approvals in place, and the people needed on the call present.

Name the person who makes the go/no-go call. If a pre-check fails, the answer is no-go, and the change is recorded as Blocked with the failed check as its evidence.

Implementation steps

  • Number every step, with one device and one action per step.
  • Write the exact commands, ready to paste, and the configuration mode they run in.
  • Give each step an expected result and a checkpoint: the command that proves the step worked before you continue.
  • Estimate each step’s duration, so you know early when the window is at risk.
  • Mark state-changing steps, and the step after which rollback becomes harder.
  • Use the platform’s safety nets. Words in capitals in the commands below are placeholders for your values.
Safety nets by platform
CheckCommandWhat good looks like
Cisco (opens in a new tab) IOS XE: save the pre-change configurationcopy running-config flash:CHG-NUMBER-pre.cfgFile in flash before the first change
Cisco (opens in a new tab) IOS XE: see what changedshow archive config differences flash:CHG-NUMBER-pre.cfgOnly the intended lines: + added, - removed
Cisco (opens in a new tab) IOS XE: roll back to the saved file: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlyconfigure replace flash:CHG-NUMBER-pre.cfgRunning configuration replaced by the saved file once you confirm the prompt; run the verification steps again
Cisco (opens in a new tab) NX-OS (opens in a new tab): checkpoint before the changecheckpoint NAMEListed in show checkpoint summary
Cisco (opens in a new tab) NX-OS (opens in a new tab): see what changedshow diff rollback-patch checkpoint NAME running-configOnly the intended lines
Cisco (opens in a new tab) NX-OS (opens in a new tab): roll back to the checkpoint: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlyrollback running-config checkpoint NAME atomicApplied only if no errors occur; run the verification steps again
Arista EOS (opens in a new tab): stage the changeconfigure session NAMEChange held until committed
Arista EOS (opens in a new tab): review before commitshow session-config diffsOnly the intended lines
Arista EOS (opens in a new tab): commit with automatic rollback: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlycommit timer 00:10:00Rolled back unless confirmed with configure session NAME commit within 10 minutes
Arista EOS (opens in a new tab): restore a saved copy: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlyconfigure replace flash:CHG-NUMBER-pre.cfgRunning configuration replaced by the file; run the verification steps again
Juniper (opens in a new tab) Junos (opens in a new tab): validate before commitcommit checkConfiguration check succeeds
Juniper (opens in a new tab) Junos (opens in a new tab): commit with automatic rollback: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlycommit confirmed 10Rolled back after 10 minutes unless you confirm with commit
Juniper (opens in a new tab) Junos (opens in a new tab): roll back to the previous commit: STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlyrollback 1Candidate loaded from the previous commit; review with show | compare, then commit
Palo Alto Networks (opens in a new tab) PAN-OS: save the pre-change configuration (configuration mode)save config to CHG-NUMBER-pre.xmlSaved before the first commit
Palo Alto Networks (opens in a new tab) PAN-OS: review before commitshow config diffOnly the intended changes
Palo Alto Networks (opens in a new tab) PAN-OS: restore the saved configuration (configuration mode): STATE-CHANGING, approved maintenance window onlyload config from CHG-NUMBER-pre.xmlCandidate loaded from the file; review, then commit to apply

Syntax varies by platform and software version; test in a lab first.

Verification steps with expected results

For each check, write the command, the expected result, and a place for the immediate and the delayed result. Expected results must be specific enough that two engineers would agree on pass or fail: “4 BGP neighbors established, received prefixes within 2% of the baseline” rather than “BGP OK”.

Include data-plane checks (probes across the paths the change touches), not only protocol state, and a delayed check at a set time after the window. End the section with the verdict: Verified, Degraded, Rolled back, Inconclusive or Blocked, as defined in how to verify a network change and in the glossary.

Rollback plan and trigger

  • The trigger, written as measurable conditions: “roll back if fewer than 46 of 48 probes pass for 60 seconds, if either core is not Active or Standby for HSRP 5 minutes after its reload, or if the BGP session to ISP-A is not established within 10 minutes.”
  • The decision owner, by name, and who they consult.
  • The latest rollback start time that still finishes inside the window.
  • The rollback steps, as exact as the implementation steps, with expected results.
  • Rollback verification: the same checks as the baseline, with the baseline as the expected result.
  • If rollback fails: who is called, in what order, and the fallback (console access, spare hardware, a vendor support case).

Where the platform offers a timed commit with automatic rollback (Junos (opens in a new tab) commit confirmed, EOS commit timer), use it for changes that could cut off your own access: the rollback then happens even if you can no longer reach the device. See rollback.

Communications

  • Before: notice to affected users and the service desk, with the window and the expected impact.
  • At the start: the bridge or channel is open, the people on it are named, and the service desk knows the change is live.
  • At milestones: the go/no-go decision, each major step, any deviation.
  • At the end: completed or rolled back, the verdict, and whom to call if something looks wrong tomorrow.
  • Contacts: carriers and vendors, with contract or case numbers, in the MOP rather than in someone’s phone.

Approvals

  • Technical review by a peer who could run the MOP.
  • The owner of each affected service, for the impact and the window.
  • Security, for any firewall policy, access-control or segmentation change.
  • The change manager or change advisory board, as your change policy requires.

Record each approver, the MOP version they approved and the date. If the MOP changes after approval, it goes back for review.

Evidence to attach to the ticket

  • The approved MOP version.
  • Pre-check outputs (the baseline), per device.
  • The configuration diff, per device.
  • Immediate and delayed verification outputs, and the probe results.
  • An execution log: each step with its time and who ran it, and any deviation from the MOP with the reason and who approved it.
  • The verdict, with one sentence of reason.
  • The communications sent.

Remove passwords, keys and community strings before attaching configurations.

Checklist

MOP review checklist

Get the template

Method of procedure (MOP) for a network change

A Word MOP template with document control, scope, devices, risk and impact, pre-checks with a go/no-go gate, numbered implementation steps, verification with expected results, the rollback plan and trigger, communications, approvals, an execution log and the evidence list.

Word template (.docx) · free

  • One email with a personal download link, valid for 72 hours.
  • No attachments, no drip campaign; we may follow up once, by a person.
  • Your details are sent securely and never placed in the page URL.

With or without REAP

How REAP helps

Before approval, REAP’s change impact analysis assesses a proposed change against topology, reachability, security policy and known CVEs, using state snapshots and path tracing, which gives the risk section of a MOP evidence instead of estimates. After the window, a before-and-after comparison with the evidence in the change ticket is a Pilot deliverable today, on one real change window in every pilot; automated state packs, verdicts and silent-failure detection are In development.

CapabilityStatus
Change impact analysis (pre-execution)Available
Post-change verification: before-and-after comparison, evidence in the change ticketPilot deliverable

Status labels as on the product status page, September 2026 release.

Questions

Straight answers

How detailed should a MOP be?

Detailed enough that a qualified engineer who did not write it can run it without calling the author: exact commands, the mode they run in, and the expected result of every step. If a step says “configure BGP”, it is not detailed enough.

Do standard changes need a MOP?

They need one tested MOP that serves as the template, approved once. Each run still records its own pre-checks, verification results and verdict.

What if we need to deviate from the MOP during the window?

Stop, write down the deviation and the reason, and get the go/no-go owner’s decision before you continue. Unrecorded deviations are how a change becomes the next postmortem.

Who should review a MOP?

A peer who could run it, for technical accuracy, and the owners of the affected services, for impact and timing. The author should not be the only person who understands it.

Does an emergency change need a MOP?

Yes, even a short one written during the incident. Capture the steps, the pre- and post-state and the verdict, and review it afterward with the same care as a planned change.

Bring us your last P1.

Keep the root cause to yourself; in a 30-minute session we walk through how REAP would have investigated it, evidence first. The replay on your own network happens inside the proof of value.