Glossary · The three doors and their outputs
Configured ≠ Compliant
The principle that a device matching its intended configuration can still violate the policy it is meant to enforce, and that redundancy which has never been tested is not redundancy.
In REAP
The third of REAP’s three sentences, the basis of Resilience Assurance’s posture and compliance findings: drift against golden configurations, standby pairs out of sync, backup paths that were never proven, policy paths that should not exist. Supporting line: uncover operational risks.
Related terms
More in the three doors and their outputs
- Automation & Change Report
- Backup-path capacity
- Change Assurance
- Change verdict
- Completed ≠ Verified
- Configuration drift
- Contextual CVE exposure
- Evidence package
- Failover readiness
- Findings Report
- Golden configuration
- Incident Reasoning
- Incident Validation Report
- Network Context Report
- Post-change verification
- Posture
- Pre-execution impact analysis
- Resilience Assurance
- Resilience finding
- Restored ≠ Fixed
- Standby health
- Three doors
Bring us your last P1.
Keep the root cause to yourself; in a 30-minute session we walk through how REAP would have investigated it, evidence first. The replay on your own network happens inside the proof of value.